Charleston White blasts DJ Akademiks over Lil Durk verdict

por Linh Yt: Charleston White

The verdict came back not guilty for Lil Durk, but Charleston White is furious that DJ Akademiks played a role in getting him off. The entire argument rests on one specific moment where Akademiks publicly stated the video evidence shown in court was scripted. White points to the black mother crying in the courtroom as undeniable proof of guilt regardless of the final ruling. He insists her emotional reaction spoke louder than any legal technicalities or procedural outcomes. According to White, it was Akademiks' public statement that actually influenced the jury to find the defendant not guilty when they otherwise wouldn't have done so. Without that specific input from the streamer, White argues the judge and jury would have convicted the defendant immediately. He claims the jury didn't need any additional evidence until Akademiks decided to make his public statement about the case. Before that intervention, the jury had already convened and the judge felt forced to address Akademiks' comments right there in front of them. White says the judge had to bring up the name and the comments because the jury was treating it as if it were evidence equivalent to a self-confession. It wasn't just a casual opinion; it became the turning point that saved the life of the defendant. White is angry about how many victims of gun violence are hurt by this dynamic, especially when the people who killed their sons get to rap and sing about it while victim mothers bury their children. He explicitly states he hopes the state court slams that person in jail.