Not A Charm@not_a_charm

Seguir

Ron Paul on his old warnings

What got me about sitting down with Dr. Ron Paul was how unremarkable his explanation sounded. No fortune telling involved. The man read history, followed economics, and paid attention to what tends to happen once a government collects more and more power into its own hands. That's the whole trick. Go back to 2002 and the former U.S. Congressman was already laying out the pieces: debt with no brakes on it, personal freedoms wearing thin, gold on the way up, and a country that couldn't stop getting pulled into foreign wars. By 2011 he'd narrowed it to Iran specifically, saying an American president might overreact one day and bomb the place. A lot of what he described back then is just the air we breathe at this point. The bit I keep turning over is his view of Congress as an institution. People arrive with good intentions, he thinks, and then the system quietly retrains them to answer to party leadership, to donors, to special interests, until their principles are the last thing on the list. He still holds that this can be reversed. You don't have to win everyone over, just a small group locked onto one idea, and that's enough to shift an entire country. At 91 the guy is out here pushing peace, liberty and honest money, which frankly is a wild thing to keep doing after watching your own warnings play out for decades

1h

Not A Charm@not_a_charm

Seguir

Ron Paul on his old warnings

What got me about sitting down with Dr. Ron Paul was how unremarkable his explanation sounded. No fortune telling involved. The man read history, followed economics, and paid attention to what tends to happen once a government collects more and more power into its own hands. That's the whole trick. Go back to 2002 and the former U.S. Congressman was already laying out the pieces: debt with no brakes on it, personal freedoms wearing thin, gold on the way up, and a country that couldn't stop getting pulled into foreign wars. By 2011 he'd narrowed it to Iran specifically, saying an American president might overreact one day and bomb the place. A lot of what he described back then is just the air we breathe at this point. The bit I keep turning over is his view of Congress as an institution. People arrive with good intentions, he thinks, and then the system quietly retrains them to answer to party leadership, to donors, to special interests, until their principles are the last thing on the list. He still holds that this can be reversed. You don't have to win everyone over, just a small group locked onto one idea, and that's enough to shift an entire country. At 91 the guy is out here pushing peace, liberty and honest money, which frankly is a wild thing to keep doing after watching your own warnings play out for decades

1h