iFANN
    Buscar no iFANN...
    Entrar
    Início
    Notícias
    Vídeos
    Fotos
    GIFs
    Explorar
    Enquetes
    Prêmios
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Salas
    Notificações
    Mensagens
    Salvos
    Perfil
    WikiPrêmiosiFAMOUSRankingsSetoresRecompensas para criadoresRecompensas para usuáriosTermosPrivacidadeDiretrizes da comunidadeRemoção / DMCAAjudaDesenvolvedores

    © 2026 iFANN

    Início
    Buscar
    Mensagens
    Alertas
    Perfil
    Foto
    Nate
    Nate@nate_51235m
    📱Qwen💭AI💭Tech
    Flint benchmark performance vs local models

    @nate_512Istg the scale of this release is barely being talked about. A US lab dropped a 40B open-weight coding model that actually tops three major benchmarks against Qwen, Muse, and Gemma. You get over 125 tokens per second on a MacBook or 150+ on RTX Spark hardware without any per-token fees or usage limits. Your personal laptop is finally the real endpoint for this tech.

    Ver publicação original

    Flint benchmark performance vs local models

    Foto de @nate_512· Oct 21, 2026· Qwen

    Sobre esta foto

    This is a data visualization of benchmark performance for different AI models. The focus is on bar charts comparing "Flint" against other models like "Qwen", "Muse", and "Gemma" across various benchmarks. The mood is informative and technical, presented in a clean, modern graphic design style. A notable detail is the use of different colored bars and labels to distinguish between model types and their performance scores. The title "Flint benchmark performance" is prominently displayed at the top, with the subtitle "Compared with local models that run on similar hardware". A logo for "recursive" is in the top right corner.

    Ver todas as fotos de QwenLer a wiki de Qwen

    ?

    Mais fotos de Qwen

    Ver todas as fotos de Qwen
    Google WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agentsGoogle WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agentsAI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxAI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BSGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BS
    Foto
    Nate
    Nate@nate_51235m
    📱Qwen💭AI💭Tech
    Flint benchmark performance vs local models

    @nate_512Istg the scale of this release is barely being talked about. A US lab dropped a 40B open-weight coding model that actually tops three major benchmarks against Qwen, Muse, and Gemma. You get over 125 tokens per second on a MacBook or 150+ on RTX Spark hardware without any per-token fees or usage limits. Your personal laptop is finally the real endpoint for this tech.

    Ver publicação original

    Flint benchmark performance vs local models

    Foto de @nate_512· Oct 21, 2026· Qwen

    Sobre esta foto

    This is a data visualization of benchmark performance for different AI models. The focus is on bar charts comparing "Flint" against other models like "Qwen", "Muse", and "Gemma" across various benchmarks. The mood is informative and technical, presented in a clean, modern graphic design style. A notable detail is the use of different colored bars and labels to distinguish between model types and their performance scores. The title "Flint benchmark performance" is prominently displayed at the top, with the subtitle "Compared with local models that run on similar hardware". A logo for "recursive" is in the top right corner.

    Ver todas as fotos de QwenLer a wiki de Qwen

    ?

    Mais fotos de Qwen

    Ver todas as fotos de Qwen
    Google WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agentsGoogle WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agentsAI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxAI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BSGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BS