iFANN
    Buscar no iFANN...
    Entrar
    Início
    Notícias
    Vídeos
    Fotos
    GIFs
    Explorar
    Enquetes
    Prêmios
    iFAMOUS
    Wiki
    Anime
    Salas
    Notificações
    Mensagens
    Salvos
    Perfil
    WikiPrêmiosiFAMOUSRankingsSetoresRecompensas para criadoresRecompensas para usuáriosTermosPrivacidadeDiretrizes da comunidadeRemoção / DMCAAjudaDesenvolvedores

    © 2026 iFANN

    Início
    Buscar
    Mensagens
    Alertas
    Perfil
    Foto
    Nate
    Nate@nate_5121d
    ⭐Andrej Karpathy🏢Google📱Qwen
    Google WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agents

    @nate_512The graph in that Google paper is what got me. Qwen-9B with evolved skills posts 47.4% across five benchmarks. Qwen-27B running bare posts 39.4%. Both Qwen, neither one fine-tuned. Smaller model wins. What skill evolution actually does: the agent takes a swing at a task, reads back its own traces, rewrites its own skill set, and keeps the rewrite only when validation says it helped. EvoSkill, SkillOpt, Trace2Skill all trip on the same thing, the lessons worth keeping end up buried in optimizer history instead of anywhere reusable. WikiSkill's fix is a wiki that lives between the traces and the skills. Karpathy's LLM Wiki is the inspiration. After every run a maintainer sorts the wins and the misses into that wiki, a proposer reads it and edits SKILL.md, and anything that turns out bad rolls back on its own. Numbers back it. WikiSkill clears the best prior method by 3.3 to 12.0 points on all five models tested. The bigger the model the more it gains: 12.3 points on Qwen 4B, 17.5 on 9B, 23.9 on 27B. Skills also travel. Qwen-27B wrote them, Qwen-9B picked them up, SpreadsheetBench went 24.3% to 50.5%. And the wiki is not decorative. Take it out and Gemini 3.5 Flash falls from 63.7% to 48.7%. Most skills out there are still written by hand. A bigger model is not the only way up. Test what evolved skills squeeze out of the one you already own first

    Ver publicação original

    Google WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agents

    Foto de @nate_512· Sep 20, 2026· Andrej Karpathy

    Sobre esta foto

    The image is a screenshot of a research paper. The focus is on the title "WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution" and a line graph showing accuracy percentages across different models. The mood is academic and informative. Visually notable elements include the Google Research logo and the graph itself, which displays four distinct lines representing different skill evolution methods. ON-SCREEN TEXT: Google Research 2026-08-28 WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution Liyan Tang¹, Cyrus Rashtchian¹, Chun-Sung Ferng¹, Andrew Tomkins¹, Da-Cheng Juan¹ and Tu Vu¹,² ¹Google Research, ²Virginia Tech Accuracy (%) 75% 60% 45% 30% Qwen3.5-4B Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.6-27B Gemini 3.5 Flash -•- No skill -EvoSkill -SkillOpt -WikiSkill

    Ver todas as fotos de Andrej KarpathyLer a wiki de Andrej Karpathy

    ?

    Mais fotos de Andrej Karpathy

    Ver todas as fotos de Andrej Karpathy
    AI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxAI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BSGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BS
    Foto
    Nate
    Nate@nate_5121d
    ⭐Andrej Karpathy🏢Google📱Qwen
    Google WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agents

    @nate_512The graph in that Google paper is what got me. Qwen-9B with evolved skills posts 47.4% across five benchmarks. Qwen-27B running bare posts 39.4%. Both Qwen, neither one fine-tuned. Smaller model wins. What skill evolution actually does: the agent takes a swing at a task, reads back its own traces, rewrites its own skill set, and keeps the rewrite only when validation says it helped. EvoSkill, SkillOpt, Trace2Skill all trip on the same thing, the lessons worth keeping end up buried in optimizer history instead of anywhere reusable. WikiSkill's fix is a wiki that lives between the traces and the skills. Karpathy's LLM Wiki is the inspiration. After every run a maintainer sorts the wins and the misses into that wiki, a proposer reads it and edits SKILL.md, and anything that turns out bad rolls back on its own. Numbers back it. WikiSkill clears the best prior method by 3.3 to 12.0 points on all five models tested. The bigger the model the more it gains: 12.3 points on Qwen 4B, 17.5 on 9B, 23.9 on 27B. Skills also travel. Qwen-27B wrote them, Qwen-9B picked them up, SpreadsheetBench went 24.3% to 50.5%. And the wiki is not decorative. Take it out and Gemini 3.5 Flash falls from 63.7% to 48.7%. Most skills out there are still written by hand. A bigger model is not the only way up. Test what evolved skills squeeze out of the one you already own first

    Ver publicação original

    Google WikiSkill paper SKILL.md agents

    Foto de @nate_512· Sep 20, 2026· Andrej Karpathy

    Sobre esta foto

    The image is a screenshot of a research paper. The focus is on the title "WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution" and a line graph showing accuracy percentages across different models. The mood is academic and informative. Visually notable elements include the Google Research logo and the graph itself, which displays four distinct lines representing different skill evolution methods. ON-SCREEN TEXT: Google Research 2026-08-28 WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution Liyan Tang¹, Cyrus Rashtchian¹, Chun-Sung Ferng¹, Andrew Tomkins¹, Da-Cheng Juan¹ and Tu Vu¹,² ¹Google Research, ²Virginia Tech Accuracy (%) 75% 60% 45% 30% Qwen3.5-4B Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.6-27B Gemini 3.5 Flash -•- No skill -EvoSkill -SkillOpt -WikiSkill

    Ver todas as fotos de Andrej KarpathyLer a wiki de Andrej Karpathy

    ?

    Mais fotos de Andrej Karpathy

    Ver todas as fotos de Andrej Karpathy
    AI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxAI models Kimi Qwen DeepSeek GLM MiniMaxQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 27B ties GPT 5.6 LunaQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreQwen 3.8 Max TerminalBench scoreOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceOrnith-1.0 agentic coding LLM performanceGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BSGLM 5.2 perfect score BridgeBench BS